Thursday, November 4, 2010

AFC – a legacy of dashed hopes and broken dreams


Dr Randy Persaud: WHEN the Alliance For Change (AFC) came on the scene back in 2006, the people who supported it had hopes and nurtured dreams that in addition to the PPP and PNC, there would be a credible third party. Although the party did not do nearly as well in the last election, it at least managed to get into parliament.
Today, the AFC is breaking up and breaking up fast. In its wake it will leave a field of broken dreams. The party has gone downhill for a number of reasons, the most important of which are noted below.
Firstly, the AFC has never made good use of its presence in parliament. Everyone knows that the party did not go to parliament fully prepared, at least on a regular basis. On many occasions the AFC had absolutely nothing to say in legislative body. This situation should have been corrected a long time ago. Instead, senior members of the AFC made huge blunders in parliament and had to apologise.
Secondly, despite five years in business, the AFC failed to broaden out its appeal. Two things can account for this. Firstly, the AFC relied too much on press statements instead of spending the time to build a wider network on the ground. Incidentally, the PPP is brilliantly organized on the ground. Press statements can be useful, but they will not mobilize new party recruits. The other problem is that the AFC has relied way too much on the diaspora for both sustenance of spirit and material support. Moreover, there has been too much reliance on friends and relatives.
Thirdly, the AFC has flipped-flopped several times regarding its relationship with the PNC. This is a big mistake because the PNCR is a credible force in the country. Flip-flopping with the WPA has no consequence because that party cannot get more than half of one percent of the votes, and this is an optimistic estimate.
Fourthly, the AFC demonstrated unfathomable naïveté by adopting the romantic notion of a rotating leadership. This principle was the darling of the WPA, a party that squandered all the good work done under the leadership of Walter Rodney. Despite every attempt to pretend that all the ducks were in a row on this subject, time and again, the top leaders showed their hands. It was never good. They all wanted to be the top dog.
Fifth and finally, it should come as no surprise that Mr. Trotman has effectively resigned from the AFC. He was truly in a Catch 22. If he were to be faithful to his party he should have become the prime ministerial candidate, i.e., Ramjattan’s running mate. But if he were to fulfill his own political ambition, then he would have to sacrifice his party. He took the second option and by so doing may have ‘given back’ his constituency to the PNC. Is this part of the Hartley Plan?

8 comments:

  1. The AFC adopted the wrong kind of working to represent the people where they sit behind a desk and try to represent and that show that they weren't ready for the task which they were going for and then there was the fight for the top spot both of the 2 member who form the party were looking for the same thing a top position but a in fight start when Trotman didn't want that now he has given up on every position in the party.SMH it such a shame that they hurried onto the scene and leaving just like how they did........

    ReplyDelete
  2. Indeed the AFC did bring some kind of hope when they came into the political scene but after a while they become to show that they don't have the potential to lead by example and made a lot of error in parliament where they had to apologize on number of occasions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. the afc came into politics as a promising party and have being a promising party over the years and has shown with there decision making and party conflicts that the are not ready to leads this country.

    ReplyDelete
  4. the afc came as the party that will represent the teenager and young people future but since in the politics the manage to pay more attention to the ppp rather than the young people.now i wonder what happen to the young people that they were to be representing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. i agree...when they first came into the politics thing it really looked like they knew wat they were doin but after a while people realized that they are all talks and no action...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Indeed this is true that the AFC has broken the dreams of its supporters when they start the in fight amongst themselves even though they didn't had a chance of win the election their supporters still had some hope in them now its all down the drain......

    ReplyDelete
  7. Even Trotman knows that the AFC has let their supporters down that why he don't want any position that the AFC has cause he know that there's nothing that could bring them back into the political scene......

    ReplyDelete
  8. When one think about the AFC...one thing come to mind, "Corruption"... They are such a disappointment to all who believed in them... at least in the beginning. But I knew for a fact that sooner or later this party would have broken up due to them building interest in the wrong things, two of the major ones being voracity and egocentricity... It was all about being in the top spot for Trotman and Ramjattan and it's a downright shame they have the face to disparage the scores of good works of the Government...

    ReplyDelete